Anticipation, Simultaneity/Consecutivity and Distinctive Features in Phonology

Renáta  Gregová

doi:10.34301/alsc.v4i2.33

Authors

Renáta Gregová Department of British and American Studies, Faculty of Arts, P. J. Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34301/alsc.v4i2.33

Keywords:

distinctive features, simultaneity, consecutivity, anticipation

Abstract

The notion of distinctive features has had a firm position in phonology since the time of the Prague Linguistic Circle and especially that of one of its representatives, Roman Jakobson, whose well-known delimitation of a phoneme as “a bundle of distinctive features” (Jakobson, 1962, p. 421), that is, a set of simultaneous distinctive features, has inspired many scholars. Jakobson’s attempt “to analyse the distribution of distinctive features along two axes: that of simultaneity and that of successiveness” (ibid., p. 435) helped cover several phonetic and/or phonological processes and phenomena. Distinctive features, although theoretical constructs (Giegerich, 1992, p. 89), reflect phonetic, that is, articulatory and acoustic, properties of sounds. In the flow of speech, some features tend to influence the neighbouring phonemes. Sometimes speech organs produce something that the brain just ‘plans’ to produce (anticipatory speech errors). There are situations where it seems as if the successive organization of phonemes went hand in hand with the simultaneous nature of certain articulatory characteristics of those phonemes (the transgression of consonants and inherence of vowels in Romportl’s theory), or the given feature seems to be anticipated by the preceding segment. This is the case with nasalization and/or anticipatory coarticulation, as well as regressive (anticipatory) assimilation. In addition, simultaneity/consecutivity is a decisive criterion for the difference between the so-called complex segments, as specified in Feature Geometry, and simple segments (Duanmu, 2009). Moreover, the phonological opposition of simultaneity- successivity (that is, consecutivity) itself functions as a feature making a difference between segmental and suprasegmental elements in the sound system of a language, as was first mentioned by Harris (1944), later indicated by Jakobson (1962) and then fully developed by Sabol (2007, 2012).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Daniloff, R. & Hammarberg, R. (1973). On defining coarticulation. Journal of Phonetics 1, 239–248.

Dvončová, J. (1980). Fyziologická fonetika. Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo, Bratislava.

Duanmu, S. (2009). Syllable Structure. The Limits of Variation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Duanmu, S. (2010). The CVX Theory of Syllable Structure. Available at http://www-personal.umich.edu/~duanmu/CUNY-CVX-2010Oct.pdf‎.

Farnetani, E. & Recasens, D. (1999). Coarticulation models in recent speech production theories. In William J. Hardcastle & Nigel Hewlett (eds.). Coarticulation. Theory, Data and Techniques. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 31–68.

Fromkin, V. A. (1973). Introduction. In Victoria A. Fromkin (ed.). Speech errors as linguistic evidence. Mouton, The Hague, Paris, 11–45.

Gregová, R. (2016). The generative and the structuralist approach to the syllable: A comparative analysis of English and Slovak. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne.

Giegerich, H. J. (1992). English phonology. An introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Hall, T. A. (2006). Segmental Features. In Paul de Lacy (ed.). A Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 311–334.

Hardcastle, W. J. & Hewlett, N. (eds.). (1999). Coarticulation. Theory, Data and Techniques. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Harris, Z. S. (1944). Simultaneous components on phonology. Language 20(4), 181–205.

Hill, A. A. (1973). Theory of Speech Errors. In Victoria A. Fromkin (ed.). Speech errors as linguistic evidence. Mouton, The Hague, Paris, 205–214.

Hučka, P. (2012). The Influence of Nasality on Vowel Quality in Slovak and English. Master’s Thesis, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University, Košice.

Chafcouloff, M. & Marchal, A. (1999). Velopharyngeal coarticulation. In William J. Hardcastle & Nigel Hewlett (eds.). Coarticulation. Theory, Data and Techniques. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 69–79.

Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound patterns of English. Harper and Row, New York.

Jakobson, R. (1962). Selected Writings, I: Phonological Studies. Mouton, The Hague.

Kráľ, Á. & Sabol, J. (1989). Fonetika a fonológia. Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo, Bratislava.

Kráľ, Á. (2005). Pravidlá slovenskej výslovnosti. Systematika a ortoepický slovník. Matica slovenská, Martin.

Kremer, J. (2012). The syntax of simultaneity. Lingua 122 (9), 979–1003.

Ladefoged, P. & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world's languages. Blackwell, Oxford.

Maturi, P. (1991). The perception of consonantal nasality in Italian: conditioning factors. In Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Aix-en-Provence, Vol. 5, 50–53.

McClain, R. & Goldrick, M. (2018). The Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Speech Production. In J. T. Wixted (ed.). Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: Wiley, 47–74.

Natsopoulos, D. & Abadzi, H. 1986. Understanding Linguistic Time Sequence and Simultaneity: A Literature Review and Some New Data. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 15 (3), 243–273.

Newman, J. (1997). Coursebook in Feature Geometry. Lincom Europa, Munich, Newcastle.

Roach, P. n.d. Connected speech and coarticulation. Available at http://www.personal.rdg.ac.uk/~llsroach/phon2/asscoareli-into.htm.

Romportl, M. (1962). K analýze zvukového systému ruštiny. Slovo a slovesnost 23 (4), 282–86.

Romportl, M. (1973). Studies in Phonetics. Academia, Prague.

Sabol, J. (1989). Syntetická fonologická teória. JÚĽŠ SAV, Bratislava.

Sabol, J. (2007). Syntagmatický a paradigmatický princíp v konexii fónických prvkov. In Ján Sabol & Ladislav Sisák (eds.). Koreferencia a konexia textu. Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Prešoviensis. Jazykovedný zborník, 48 (AFPh UP 96/178). Prešov: Filozofická fakulta Prešovskej univerzity, 13–20.

Sabol, J. (2012). Semiotické pozadie segmentov a suprasegmetov. Jazykoveda v pohybe. 59–69.

Sagey, E. C. (1986). The Representation of Features and Relations in Non-linear Phonology. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.

Sheer, T. (2012). Invariant syllable skeleton, complex segments and word edges. Journal of Linguistics 48, 685–726.

Swarup, S. & Gasser, L. (2007). The Role of Anticipation in the Emergence of Language. In Martin V. Butz, Olivier Sigaud, Giovanni Pezzulo and Gianluca Baldassarre (eds.). Anticipatory Behavior in Adaptive Learning Systems. ABiALS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4520. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 35–56.

Vachek, J. (1989). Written Language Revisited. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, Philadelphia.