WHAT IS THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE INFLUENCE OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP ON STAFF MORALE, JOB SATISFACTION, AND MOTIVATION?

Ruba  Mohamed Najia

doi:10.34301/alsc.v4i1.31

Authors

Ruba Mohamed Najia English Language Lecturer at Kuwait College of Science & Technology, English Language Department

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34301/alsc.v4i1.31

Keywords:

morale, job satisfaction, motivation, leadership.

Abstract

In a time where retaining qualified teachers is crucial, one cannot ignore the importance of teacher job satisfaction, morale, and motivation in shaping teachers’ intentions to remain in the profession. This is where educational leadership comes into play. This paper looks at the nature and extent of the impact of educational leadership on three important aspects of the job, namely staff morale, job satisfaction, and motivation. The latter constructs are each redefined and reconceptualized as the lack of consensus and the ambiguity in their respective meanings can greatly affect how they are applied as well as their results. When applied to the teaching context, Herzberg’s motivation hygiene theory was found to be unapplicable in relation to theory transferability and the separate categorization of job satisfaction and dissatisfaction. The latter are greatly affected by not only leadership style per se, but more precisely by the teacher’s perception of a certain leadership style. This individuality dimension also affects the ideological compatibility between teachers and work contexts, having a direct impact on job satisfaction. Nonetheless, although educational leadership has proven not to be the sole factor in teacher job satisfaction, morale and motivation, leaders must possess the right knowledge and understanding about the needs, expectations, attitudinal responses, and characteristics of their staff as individual members of a group in order to be able to positively affect their perceptions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alimo-Metcalfe, B. & Alban-Metcalfe, J. (2005) “Leadership: Time for a New Direction?”, Leadership, vol.1, no.1, pp. 51-71.

Anderman, E., Belzer, L. & Smith, J. (1991) “Teacher Commitment and Job Satisfaction: The Role of School Culture and Principal Leadership” In: The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 3-7 April 1991, Chicago. Urbana: Na-tional Center for School Leadership.

Ball, C. & Stenlund, V. (1990) “The Centrality of Work, Working Conditions and Job Satisfaction of Teachers in Canada: an Ontario study”, Comparative Education, vol.26, no. 2/3, pp. 319-330.

Bogler, R. (2001) “The Influence of Leadership Style on Teacher Job Satisfaction”, Educational Administration Quarterly, vol.37, no.5, pp. 662-683.

Butt, G. & Lance, A. (2005) “Secondary Teacher Workload and Job Satisfaction”, Educational Management Leadership & Administration, vol.33 , no.4, pp. 401-422.

Crossman, A. & Harris, P. (2006) “Job Satisfaction of Secondary School Teachers”, Educational Management Leadership & Administration, vol.34, no.1, pp. 29-46.

Evans, L. (1997) “Addressing problems of conceptualizations and construct validity in researching teacher’s job satisfaction”, Educational Research, vol.39, no.3, pp. 319-331.

Evans, L. (1997) “Understanding Teacher Morale and Job Satisfaction”, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol.13, no.8, pp. 831-845.

Evans, L. (1998) Teacher morale, job satisfaction and motivation, London: Paul Chapman.

Evans, L. (1999) Managing to motivate: a guide for school leaders, London: Cassell.

Evans, L. (2001) “Delving Deeper into Morale, Job Satisfaction and Motivation among Education Professionals: Re-examining the Leadership Dimension”, Educational Management and Administration, vol.29, no.3, pp. 291-306.

Ladebo, O. (2005) “Effects of Work-related Attitudes on the Intention to Leave the Profession: An Examination of School Teachers in Nigeria”, Educational Management Leadership & Administration, vol.33, no.3, pp. 355-369.

Mercer, D. & Evans, B. (1991) “Professional Myopia: job satisfaction and the management of teachers”, School Leadership & Management, vol. 11, no.3, pp. 291-301.

Nias, J. (1980) “Leadership Styles and Job-Satisfaction in Primary Schools”, in Bush, T., Glatter, R., Goodey, J. & Riches, C. (eds.) Approaches to School Management, London: The Open University Press.

Nias, J. (1981) “Teacher Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction: Herzberg’s ‘two-factor’ hypothesis revisited”, British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol.2, no.3, pp. 235-246.

Nias, J. (1989) Primary Teachers talking: A Study of Teaching as Work, London: Routledge.

Rodgers-Jenkinson, F. & Chapman, D. (1990) “Job Satisfaction of Jamaican Elementary School Teachers”, International Review of Education, vol.36, no.3, pp. 299-313.

Seco, G. (2002) Teacher satisfaction: some practical implications for teacher professional development models. In: The European Conference on Educational Research, 11-14 September 2002, Lisbon. Urbana: University of Lisbon.

Shechtman, Z., Zou’bi, M. & Katz, M. (1994) “Principal Leadership Style and Teacher Feelings and Behavior: Arab Schools in Israel”, The School Community Journal, vol.4, no.2, pp. 53-66.

Ting-Hong, W. (1989) “The Impact of Job Satisfaction on Intention to Change Jobs among Secondary School Teachers in Hong Kong”, CUHK Education Journal, vol.17, no.2, pp. 176-185.

Weiss, E. (1999) “Perceived workplace conditions and first-year teachers’ morale, career choice commitment and planned retention: a secondary analysis”, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol.15, pp. 861-879.