The Role of Facebook in the Development of Civic Engagement in Morocco
Keywords:engagement, civic engagement, online engagement, slacktivism, social media
The study investigates the factors that inspire Moroccans to engage in both online and offline civic efforts. The inquiry targeted demographics, frequency of Facebook use, the influence of online engagement on participation in real life and the main motivations behind Moroccan civic engagement online. Both qualitative and quantitative research methods were adopted to collect and analyze both primary and secondary data. An online survey was administered to (n=277) participants through Facebook targeting the general public of Moroccan Facebook users to collect primary data. Secondary data was collected via semi-structured interviews with (n=3) social activists to provide a comprehensive view of both normal citizens and people who can be considered specialists in the field. The findings revealed the extent to which Moroccans’ usage of Facebook influences their engagement both online and offline, indicating that social media use for civic purposes is significantly related to offline participation. Despite that, higher levels of the so-called “slacktivism” behaviors dominate Moroccans’ civic activities performed on Facebook. Findings in general support the fact that Facebook plays a significant role in the development of civic engagement in Morocco.
Alexa.com. (2019). Top Sites in Morocco - Alexa. [online] Available at: https://www.alexa.com/topsites/countries/MA [Accessed 16 Feb. 2019].
Al-Rawi, A. (2016). Facebook as a virtual mosque: the online protest against Innocence of Muslims. Culture and Religion, 17(1), 19-34.
Alshenqeeti, H. (2014). Interviewing as a data collection method: A critical review. English Linguistics Research, 3(1), 39-45.
Auger, G. A. (2013). Fostering democracy through social media: Evaluating diametrically opposed nonprofit advocacy organizations’ use of Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 369-376.
Amadu, L., Muhammad, S., Mohammed, A., Owusu, G. and Lukman, S. (2019). Using technology acceptance model to measure the use of social media for collaborative learning in Ghana. [online] Jotse.org. Available at: http://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse/article/view/383/337 [Accessed 5 Jun. 2019].
Banaji, S., & Buckingham, D. (2010). Young people, the Internet, and civic participation: An overview of key findings from the CivicWeb project. International Journal of Learning and media, 2(1), 15-24.
Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1-19.
Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences 6th edition. Pearson;.
Blau, P. M. (1968). Social exchange. International encyclopedia of the social sciences, 7, 452-457.
Boland, J. A. (2011). Positioning civic engagement on the higher education landscape: Insights from a civically engaged pedagogy. Tertiary Education and Management, 17(2), 101-115.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J., Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood: 241–258
Brandwatch. (2019). 53 Incredible Facebook Statistics and Facts. [online] Available at: https://www.brandwatch.com/blog/facebook-statistics/ [Accessed 17 Feb. 2019].
Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2011) “Business Research Methods” 3rd edition, Oxford University Press, United States of America, New York.
Charman-Anderson, S. (2010). Making the Connection Civil Society and Social Media.
Cho, A. (2020). Digital civic engagement by young people.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Dasgupta, P., &Serageldin, I. (Eds.). (2001). Social capital: A multifaceted approach. Oxford University Press.
DellaVigna, S., List, J. A., & Malmendier, U. (2012). Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. The quarterly journal of economics, 127(1), 1-56.
Donath, J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. Communities in cyberspace, 1996, 29-59.
Ecimovic T., Esposito M., Mulej M., Haw R.B. (2009). The individual and corporate social responsibility. Retrieved from http://www.institutclimatechange.si/pdfs/kRogerMatjazCSRfinalMAY2008SAVjan2009.pdf
El Haouta, I & Idelhadj, A. (2018). Tracking community motivation to use online social networks: A case study of facebook. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. 96. 7615-7627.
Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. J. Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.
Euler, Kathleen. The face of Al-Maghreb: how Moroccans are using social networking. Diss. University of Pittsburgh, (2013).
Facebook.com. (2019). Bringing the World Closer Together | Facebook. [online] Available at: https://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-zuckerberg/bringing-the-world-closer together/10154944663901634/ [Accessed 16 Feb. 2019].
Facebook.com. (2019). What is tagging and how does it work? | Facebook Help Centre | Facebook. [online] Available at: https://www.facebook.com/help/124970597582337/ [Accessed 14 May. 2019].
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press.
Halupka, M. (2014). Clicktivism: A systematic heuristic. Policy & Internet, 6(2), 115-132.
Harraqi, M. (2017). Social Media and Its Role in Promoting Change in Morocco. International Journal of Information and Communication Sciences, 2(6), 110-115.
Hattani, H. A. (2017). New media and civic participation in Morocco. Journal of Media Research-Revista de Studii Media, 10(29), 5-25.
Isrworld.org. (2008). Individual Social Responsibility (ISR). [online] Available at: http://www.isrworld.org/2008/06/ [Accessed 19 April. 2019].
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
Lee, Y. H., & Hsieh, G. (2013). Does slacktivism hurt activism? the effects of moral balancing and consistency in online activism. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 811-820
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2013). Practical Research: Planning and Design. 10th.
Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22, 28?51
Livingstone, S., Couldry, N., & Markham, T. (2007). Youthful steps towards civic participation: does the Internet help?.
McCafferty, D. (2011). Activism vs. slacktivism. Communications of the ACM, 54(12), 17-19.
Merriam-webster.com. (2019). Definition of SOCIAL MEDIA. [online] Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/social media [Accessed 15 Feb. 2019].
Meyer, M. D., & Bray, C. W. (2013). Emerging adult usage of social networks as sites of activism: A critical examination of the TOMS and TWLOHA movements. Ohio Communication Journal, 51(October), 53-77.
Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., & Barrett, K. C. (2004). SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation. Psychology Press.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2007). Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation. MIt Press.
Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge University Press.
Omoto, A. M., & Snyder, M. (1995). Sustained helping without obligation: motivation, longevity of service, and perceived attitude change among AIDS volunteers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 68(4), 671-686.
P?ce?il? M. (2017). Corporate volunteering: trends, benefits and challenges. Current situation in Romania.Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, vol. 12, issue 2, pp. 19-29.
P?ce?il?, M. (2018). THE INDIVIDUAL SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: INSIGHTS FROM A LITERATURE REVIEW. Management Research and Practice, 10(1), 17-26. Princeton University Press.
Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In L. M. Given (Ed.) The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. (Vol.2). Sage: Los Angeles, pp. 697-698.
Purdy, S. J. (2013). The Internet and Mass Society: Civic Engagement in the Digital Age.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political science and politics, 28(4), 664-683.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Making democracy work: Civic traditions m modern Italy. Princeton, NJ:
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. In Culture and politics (pp. 223-234). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Quan-Haase, A., Wellman, B., Witte, J. C., & Hampton, K. N. (2002). Capitalizing on the net: Social contact, civic engagement, and sense of community. The Internet in everyday life, 291-324.
Rahman, Zahir. "Online youth political activism in Morocco: Facebook and the birth of the February 20th movement." Journal of New Media Studies in MENA 1 (2012).
Shah, D., Schmierbach, M., Hawkins, J., Espino, R., & Donavan, J. (2002). Nonrecursive models of Internet use and community engagement: Questioning whether time spent online erodes social capital. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79 (4), 964-987.
Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 920-942.
Valenzuela, S., Park, N., & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 14(4), 875-901.
Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS quarterly, 35-57.
Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Net-surfers don’t ride alone: Virtual communities as communities. Networks in the global village: Life in contemporary communities, 10(3), 34-60.
Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Carpini, M. X. D. (2006). A new engagement?: Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. Oxford University Press.