DESIGNING THE SLOVAK MATRIX SENTENCE TEST

  • Renáta Panocová Faculty of Arts, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Slovakia
  • Renáta Gregová Faculty of Arts, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Slovakia
Keywords: Slovak matrix test, audiometry, speech perception, speech reception threshold

Abstract

This paper presents partial results of a larger-scale project of designing the matrix sentence test for Slovak. The main aim is presentation and detailed discussion of linguistic aspects of Slovak matrix sentence test. First, morphosyntactic criteria are outlined. These are followed by description of problematic issues and the solutions proposed. Second, phonological criteria are given and discussed. In the next step, the matrix test will be optimized and evaluated in order to measure speech intelligibility function and to establish the correct reference data for listeners with normal hearing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akeroyd M. A, Arlinger S., Bentler R. A. et al. 2015. ICRA recommendations for the construction of multilingual speech tests. Int j Audiol, 54(S2), DOI 10.3109/14992027.2015.1030513.

Boboshko M, Warzybok A, Zokoll MA, Maltseva N (2013) RUMatrix test: construction, evaluation and clinical validation. Otorhinolaryngologia Hungarica. Vol. 59, N 2.-P. 49 (Abstracts of the 11th EFAS Congress Budapest).

Dietz A., Buschermöhle M., Aarnisalo A.A., Vanhanen A., Hyyrynen T. et al. 2014. The development and evaluation of the Finnish matrix sentence test for speech intelligibility assessment. Acta Otolaryngol, 134(7), 728–737.

Hagerman B. 1982. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scandinavian Audiology, 11, 79–87.

Hochmuth S., Brand, T., Zokoll M.A., Zenker Castro F., Wardenga N. Et al. 2012. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise. Int J Audiol, 51, 536–544.

Houben R., Koopman J., Luts H., Wagener K.C., van Wieringen A. et al. 2014. Development of a Dutch matrix sentence test to assess speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol, 53, 760–763

Jansen S., Luts H., Wagener K.C., Kollmeier B., Del Rio M. et al. 2012. Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: A multi- center study. Int J Audiol, 51, 164–173.

Kráľ, Á. Pravidlá slovenskej výslovnosti. Systematika a ortoepický slovník. Matica slovenská 2005.

Kollmeier B. & Wesselkamp M. 1997. Development and evaluation of a sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am, 102, 1085–1099.

Kollmeier B., Warzybok A., Hochmuth S., Zokoll M., Uslar et al (2015). The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications and comparison across languages – a review. Accepted for publication in Int J Audiol, DOI 10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971

Luts H., Boon E., Wable J. & Wouters J. 2008. FIST: A French sentence test for speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol, 47, 373–374.

Nielsen J.B. & Dau T. 2011. The Danish hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol, 50, 202–208.

Nilsson M., Soli S.D. & Sullivan J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085–1099.

Plomp R. & Mimpen A.M. 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiol, 18, 43–53.

Roach, P. 2000. English Phonetics and Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ozimek E, Warzybok A, Kutzner D (2010). Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise, Int. J. Audiol. 49:444-454.

Slovenský národný korpus – prim-7.0-public-all. [Slovak national corpus – prim-7.0-public-all.] Bratislava: Jazykovedný ústav Ľ. Štúra SAV 2015. Available at WWW: http://korpus.juls.savba.sk.

Štefánik, J. – Rusko, M. – Považanec, D. 1999. Frekvencia slov, grafém, hlások a ďalších elementov slovenského jazyka. Jazykovedný časopis, 50, 1999, No. 2, pp. 81 – 93.

Versfeld N.J., Daalder L., Festen J.M. & Houtgast T. 2000. Method for the selection of sentence material for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1671–1684.

Wagener K., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 1999a. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests in deutscher Sprache Teil II: Optimierung des Oldenburger Satztests (in German). (Development and evaluation of a German sentence test, Part II: Optimization of the Oldenburg sentence tests). Z Audiol, 38, 44–56.

Wagener K., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 1999b. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache Teil III: Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests (in German). (Development and evaluation of a German sentence test – Part III: Evaluation of the Oldenburg sentence test). Z Audiol, 38, 86–95.

Wagener K., Kühnel V. & Kollmeier B. 1999c. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests in deutscher Sprache I: Design des Oldenburger Satztests (in German). (Development and evaluation of a German sentence test – Part I: Design of the Oldenburg sentence test). Z Audiol, 38, 4–15.

van Wieringen A. & Wouters J. 2008. LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 47(6), 348–355

Warzybok, A., Zokoll, M., Wardenga, N.,, Ozimek, E., Boboshko, M. & Kollmeier, B. (2015) Development of the Russian matrix sentence test, International Journal of Audiology, 54:sup2, 35-43, DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1020969

Wong L.L.N. & Soli S.D. 2008. The Cantonese version of the hearing in noise test (CHINT). Int J Audiol, 47(6), 388–390.

Published
2019-07-30
How to Cite
Panocová, R., & Gregová, R. (2019). DESIGNING THE SLOVAK MATRIX SENTENCE TEST. The International Journal of Applied Language Studies and Culture, 2(2), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.34301/alsc.v2i2.23