INFERENCING FAKE WORDS’ MEANING BY MOROCCAN EFL LEARNERS

Authors

  • Fatima Zahra EL MALAKI Applied Linguistics Research Group, Mohammed V University, Faculty of Education, Rabat, Morocco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34301/alsc.v3i1.25

Keywords:

mental lexicon, lexical inferencing, frame, context, stored meaning

Abstract

Do Moroccan EFL learners depend on the context to infer the meaning of unknown words occurring in sentences? This study investigates the way intermediate and advanced learners infer the meaning of fake words. To this end, the subjects took a test consisting of 60 items with three multiple choices. Subjects were asked to provide appropriate, inappropriate meanings of the unknown word or none of the choices without using dictionaries. The Chi-2 tests were adopted to determine whether there is a) a statistically significant difference between the three categories and b) a statistically significant difference between intermediate and advanced learners’ inferencing results. The findings demonstrate that the context along with the lexical knowledge of the L2 learners play the most important role in understanding vocabulary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aitchison, J. (2003). Words in the mind: an introduction to the mental lexicon. Oxford: Blackwell.

Anderson, A. (1983). Semantic and social-pragmatic aspects of meaning in task- oriented dialogue. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Glasgow.

Anderson, J.R. (1976). Language. memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.

Anderson, J.R., & Bower, G.H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, D.C.: Winston.

Collins. A.M., & Quillian, M.R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, R, 240-247.

Fodor, J.D. (1977). Semantics: Theories of meaning in generative grammar. New York: Crowell.

Fodor, J.D., Fodor, J.A., & Garrett, M.F. (1975). The psychological unreality of semantic representations. Linguistic Inquiry, 4, 515-531.

Glass, A.L., & Holyoak, K.J. (1974/5). Alternative conceptions of semantic memory. Cognition, 3,31>339.

Kmtsch. W. (1974). The represention of meaning in memory. Hillsdale. N.J.: Erlbaum.

Peppard, J. (2007). Exploring the relationship between word-association and learners’ lexical development. Retrieved December 31, 2010, from

http://www.cels.bham.ac.uk/resources/essays/Peppard_Mod_2.pdf

Rumelhart, D.E., Lindsay, P.H.. & Norman. D.A. (1972). A process model for long-term memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.) Organization and memory. New York: Academic Press.

Richards, C. and Schmidt, R. (2002) Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (3rd edition). London: Longman.

Schaeffer, B., & Wallace, R. (1970). The comparison of word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 86,134-152.

Smith, E.E., Shohen. E.J.. & Rips, L.J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: a featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Reviews, 81, 214-241.

Firth, J R. (1935). The Technique of Semantics. Transactions of the Philological Society, 36-72 (Reprinted in Firth (1957) Papers in Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press, 7-33).

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Zahra EL MALAKI, F. . (2020). INFERENCING FAKE WORDS’ MEANING BY MOROCCAN EFL LEARNERS. The International Journal of Applied Language Studies and Culture, 3(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.34301/alsc.v3i1.25